It's Inevitable - Not A
Matter Of If - But When
By Marjorie Tietjen
Has anyone else noticed how the media is making a habit of declaring that such and such is "inevitable" or "it's not a matter of if but when"? Several years ago I began noticing these repetitive statements in all forms of media. This caused me to begin wondering how officials could be so sure these predicted future events would take place.
First the thought came to me...well....maybe those coming up with the predicitions are perhaps psychic or that maybe collectively we are, in a way, creating these experiences or events by holding them fearfully in conciousness. I do try to be open to most new or novel ideas. Other's would say that the horrible events ,which come about as predicited, are God's wrath. Still others would suggest that it's all part of the master plan to form world government. The conclusion most people come to is that government scientists, technology, and our "Intelligence Agencies", are just so far advanced that we shouldn't even question their predictive capabilities....they are "all knowing".
I tend to think it's a little bit of all of the above.
Here is an excerpt from World News And Report, June 17, 2002 : By Mortimer Zuckerman.
"Even though the American people on Sept 11 witnessed the horror of terrorism up close, at home over and over again on television, they still seem to underestimate this new threat. Our most senior officials tell us that attacks using weapons of mass destruction are inevitable. Not a matter of if..but when."
As Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfield put it....."terrorist networks are aggressively trying to get nuclear weapons and they would not hesitate one minute in using them."
Seems as if we are having trouble finding all the weapons of mass destruction.
In the case where the possibility or certainty of anthrax biological warfare was predicited, our government made it quite public what their solution might be....forced anthrax vaccines for everyone. If these forced vaccines were for our protection...as they were claimed to be...wouldn't it be an excercise in futility? Wouldn't the supposed enemy use a different biological agent which we wouldn't have been vaccinated for? After all, this vaccination plan permeated the media. I'm sure our "enemies" also watch T.V. and read newspapers. This publicity led me to the suspicion that the anthrax vaccines were not really for our protection.
In fact, due to my research into the politics of Lyme Disease and related misdiagnosed diseases...such as Lupus, ALS, M.S. , Fibromyalgia, Chronic Fatigue Syndrome, Gulf War Illness, etc, I have come to the conclusion that they are threatening us with the scare of lethal contagious diseases when all the while chronic disabling degenerative diseases are being allowed to pass through the population undetected. This appears to have been accomplished by calling just about every new disease "autoimmune". There has been an obvious and intentional lack of research into infectious causes for these so called autoimmune diseases. Those of us who insist that we have chronic lyme or mycoplasma infections are generally denied antibiotics. Most insurance does not cover natural treatments.....so....people's diseases are left to progress and pass on to others. It is believed these microbes can pass on to others...friends, family and coworkers. Many times the microbes will affect these people where their weakness lie and cause different symptoms than the person who may have passed it on to them manifested. Another disease label is then given to the family member or coworker.
Dr. Donald MacArthur, who was in charge of the developement and testing of biological weapons for the Pentagon, spoke at a Hearing before a Subcommittee of the Committee on Appropriations in 1969 and tells us the following : "Incapacitating agents are a more recent developement in the R&D phase. In fact, the prime emphasis in agent R&D is on developing better incapacitiating agents. We are synthesizing new compounds and testing them in animals. I should mention that there is a rule of thumb we use. Before an agent can be classified as an incapacitant, we feel the mortality should be very low. Therefore the ratio of the lethal dose to the incapacitating dose has to be very high. Now, this is a very technical job. We have some of the top scientists in the country working on this. It is not easy." He also tells us that an incapacitating agent "imposes a greater logistic burden on the enemy when he has to look after the disabled people."
Incapacitants would also slowly destroy the economy.
A few more predicitions of inevitable events
A. Hurricanes will be increasingly severe
B. The eruption of Mt St. Helen is "not a matter of it but when".....Could this be predicted because our scalar weapons technology can cause geological and weather events such as earthquakes, tidal waves, hurricanes and even volcanic eruptions?
C. FBI Director Robert Mueller says suicide bombings in the U.S are "inevitable"
D. Vice President Cheney tells us that the prospects of a future attack on the U.S. is almost certain "not a matter of if but when."
E. Donald Rumsfield - Assoc. Press Jan 31, 2002 " Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfield said Thursday the United States must prepare now for potential surprise attacks "vastly more deadly" than Sept. 11 terrorist hijackings.
All this certainty and high publicity of these specific warlike events should, one would think, warn the "enemy" that we are on to their tricks. Wouldn't this then cause an enemy , with any intelligence, to change their tactics or instigate the event sooner...so as to foil the United State's protective plans? Well.... not if the real enemy was from within.
There appears to be an astronomical increase of adverse events within the past few years. We've had to deal with terrorist attacks, killer hurricanes, school shootings ( possible promoting of gun control ), kidnappings have been highly emphasized ( eventual microchipping of children), earthquakes, volcanic eruptions, drought, floods, forest fires, disease epidemic scares, etc. Doesn't this seem a bit excessive? Of course, in the past, many of the natural events do occur from time to time...but not with such intensity nor in such rapid succession. And all the while these events are taking place ( faster than we can assimilate them ), our rights are quickly being stripped from us.
Scare, Divert, Confuse, Overwhelm and Divide and Conquer. These are the main tactics we must be alert to!
Remember a day or two after the Sept 11 attacks, President Bush told the nation who every terrorist was and that we were now entering a war on terrorism...with no forseeable end in sight and that Sept 11 has changed forever...our country and the world. How would they know that? I believe those statements were made to ensure public cooperation as our rights are consistently taken away in the name of protection and security.
Are most of these predictions made with such certainty because they are orchestrated or will be orchestrated by the predictors themselves?
I feel that becoming aware of these possible tactics and the social conditioning being heaped upon us, will foil or at least slow down those who may really be planning these predicited events, aimed at destroying our health and freedom. Next time you hear "This is inevitable" or..".It's not a matter of if but when"......think about and analyze what is being said and then point it out to others.