FORCED VACCINATIONS OF HEALTH-CARE WORKERS: ANALYZE THE RATIONALE

Yesterday I attended a social function where I learned a bit more about hospital politics. A friend, who is an anesthesiologist, was very concerned over the changes being made in the hospital where she has worked for many years.She wasn't specific about the changes but did say these changes were not in the best interests of the patient. I half jokingly responded saying that these changes were probably in the best interests of the corporations. Her eyes widened and she exclaimed just how "on target" I was. YES, she said....that was the exact inference that hospital management made clear to us. Then my friend proceeded
to relate to me one of her greatest concerns, one that she personally had to deal with......forced vaccinations of health care workers.

I was told about the Hospital Honor Rolls and how "entities/organizations confer Honor Roll status to hospitals who succeed in mandating that a large percentage of their health care workers get vaccinated. There are several very serious issues that need to be addressed and analyzed before this freedom stripping practice is carried any further. First of all , there are no long term studies, that have been made public, that show any evidence of long term safety. When the safety of vaccines is discussed, only short term side effects are mentioned. This tactic, used by the vaccine industry, is used to infer that there ARE NO long term side effects. Most people, after they themselves have been vaccinated or after they have vaccinated their children, often breathe a sigh of relief when they or their children show no immediate side effects. However, should the long term effects of vaccines on the immune system and on the brain, be our PRIMARY concern? The vaccine manufacturers are very aware that it is very difficult, if not impossible to correlate future chronic illnesses, such as autoimmune disease, with past vaccinations. Why is there never any serious mention of this crucial issue by mainstream medicine?

Let's take a look at the immunity issue. You must have noticed that our population consists of several different classes of people who carry germs. Healthy people carry germs. Vaccinated people carry germs also. Then of course sick people carry germs. In fact, everyone carries germs and has the potential to pass these microbes on to others. Why do some people remain healthy while others succumb to disease, when they are exposed to the same germs? The answer lies in the individual's innate immunity....the ability of their body to fight off disease. What then determines a person's natural innate immunity? Heredity may play a role but the main determining factors lie in how we take care of our bodies. Injecting foreign animal DNA, viruses, bacteria and chemical toxins directly into our bloodstream, is not the answer. Diet, exercise, proper rest and stress reduction, reduction of exposure to environmental toxins(such as those found in vaccines), and healthy exposure to sunlight are the prime disease fighting components of a truly healthy person. There is a very strong concern that vaccinations are negatively hyper- activating the immune systems of many people and that this may be one of the explanations for our growing pandemic of autoimmune illnesses.

The theory of vaccination says that when we are vaccinated, we are still harboring (in the case of hospital workers) flu germs but that the drugs and chemicals we were just injected with supposedly prevent the germs from entering our cells and making us sick. The vaccinated person and the unvaccinated healthy person can still have flu germs and can pass them on to others. Getting vaccinated does not eliminate the flu germ from a person's body.A person who has the outward symptoms of disease, such as coughing and sneezing may be able to pass on the germs a bit more readily than than healthy people...but the people who are affected by the flu are more readily detected and aware of the illness being present so they are more likely than the vaccinated or healthy people...to quarantine themselves by staying home or away from patients or by wearing a mask, gloves...etc. So...the very basis of vaccinating health care workers to prevent the illness of patients, needs to be strictly and thoroughly questioned.

                                          FERMENTED FOODS FOR IMMUNITY
Vaccines are a dangerous violation of our body's natural immune integrity. Injections of foreign materials, (such as animal products, microbes, and toxic chemicals) directly into the bloodstream, bypasses our natural defenses to these germs. If you are a hospital administrator and you want your hospital to truly be on the cutting edge...the humane progressive cutting edge....then please check out the Price Pottenger Nutrition Foundation www.ppnf.org  and study the information found there. Read Nutrition and Physical Degeneration by Dr. Weston A Price and learn how diet can enhance our true immunity and prevent disease of all kinds...not just the flu. However, don't be frightened away, thinking that if everyone is healthy then the hospitals will have less business and will go bankrupt. I doubt that this will happen anytime soon, since poor diet and iatrogenic causes of disease are still main factors in disease causation, and unfortunately allopathic medicine will be needed for quite some time till we can turn things around and make money through disease prevention.

Thankfully, my friend and a co-worker of hers, were able to get waivers , here in Connecticut, to prevent(in their cases) this forcible act against health and freedom. However, others who were not as well informed had no choice in the matter and submitted to these injections. The choice was either get injected or leave your job. I cannot imagine that this is happening(without much protest) in The United States of America, where we are supposed to be free and to have dominion over our own bodies. This is serious stuff and the medical system needs to be taken to task on this issue before it is too late and vaccines are required. The time is fast approaching where insurance companies and doctors will require that patients be vaccinated before they can be treated. It makes one wonder if there is more to this extreme push for vaccine after vaccine......other than making money.This may sound far-fetched but we need to ask these questions.....is our DNA being manipulated through vaccines, do vaccines make us ill in the long run and create a further market for drugs, and are there anti-fertility substances included in vaccines...especially the HPV vaccine. Does the  advertisement slogan for this vaccine "One less" mean birth control?

If the medical system really cared about public health, they would be warning the public about the dangers of sugar and other processed foods and how these refined substances sabotage our immune systems. They would also be encouraging natural, live , fermented foods, as these foods provide a crucial part of our immune system. Most if not all of our foods have been pasteurized, which effectively negates any immune boosting properties of foods which have been fermented. Examples are pasteurized cider, sauerkraut, pickles, beer, wine, etc. In his anthropological studies, Dr. Weston Price found that all "cultures" ate cultured or live fermented  foods that were unpasteurized and that this process(among others) accounted for their robust health and immunity.In fact these indigenous people religiously and sacredly guarded these regional cultures or ferments ( helpful bacteria) which brought them such health and vigor. When travelers from other countries would come to the shores of North America, they brought their "cultures" with them. The more one considers the term "culture" which is now used to describe an indigenous people's native customs, skills and arts, one can imagine how the word originated...the deep roots and real meaning of "culture"

Again, a recipe for good health and efficient immunity....does not come from adding more stresses to the body (such as the toxic ingredients in vaccines). Real immunity comes from feeding the body the foods it was meant to run on. You don't expect a gasoline engine to run on water. Likewise you can't expect the magnificent human creation to run on manmade processed junk! We truly are what we eat. Please check out www.ppnf.org  for reliable health information that has proven itself with indigenous cultures around the world. Read Nutrition and Physical Degeneration by Dr. Weston A Price. Proper diet can bring back honest statesmanship to our government and health to our people and to future generations. If we don't act now and stand up to Big Agriculture and the allopathic medical system, our health will continue to deteriorate. I am not exaggerating when I say that the survival of the human race depends on observing and honoring the foods our ancestors ate and the mehtods they used to prepare this food.

If you want to learn more about the fun, healthy and inexpensive practice of fermentation, check out Cultures For Health. Life will be much simpler and healthier for all of us if we observe what healthy people ate and how they prepared their foods. Learn how to make fermented drinks, sourdough bread, fermented milk products and fermented vegetables. I find it to be truly fascinating! 

You also may want to check out a post I wrote about elderberries and the way that the components in this fruit  prevent the bacteria and viruses from entering the cells.http://www.foodfreedomrevolution.blogspot.com/2010/09/elder-berry-for-flu.html

I have found that making my own elderberry tincture from dried berries, has been very helpful in preventing flu and colds, when taken at the first sign of illness and/or as a preventative when venturing out to a place where you know you will be exposed. It is also helpful to take it when under stress.

For a very helpful talk on vaccines from the In Short Order Radio Show, check out this episode

Listen to internet radio with In Short Order on Blog Talk Radio

VACCINES : MOTIVES BEHIND THE PUSH!

What would be required for a totalitarian government to form and then thrive in a nation long spoiled by relative freedom? It would be known by those currently in control or by those steadily gaining control...that if they desired total control...then their attempts to take control would need to be camouflaged to prevent outright revolution. I will present a hypothesis and you can judge as to whether it fits or not.

A few years ago I wrote an article entitled Antidepressants: Motives Behind The Push http://lymesentinel.blogspot.com/search/label/ANTIDEPRESSANTS  It talks about the dangers of antidepressants and why there is such a push to get most of the population taking them. As a lyme disease patient and advocate I have personally witnessed the obsessive push to convince those suffering from infectious disease that their symptoms are all in their head and that antidepressants will fix them up just fine. Aldous Huxley, in his book "Brave New World", foresaw a society where the population would be psychologically conditioned and numbed by a drug called soma. Please check out these soma quotes from Brave New World http://www.huxley.net/soma/somaquote.html  Take time to compare the similarities between the scenerio in this book and what we are currently experiencing.

As most of you have probably noticed there is also an extensive push for vaccines.....but so far these vaccines have been mostly for the prevention of infectious disease. ...at least that is what we are told. In recent years more and more researchers, doctors and citizens are questioning the real effectiveness of vaccines and the harm they may cause. Advertisements for vaccines are made to sound as if the corporations that make the vaccines and the government and medical industry that is promoting them...loves us and is concerned about our health. If we really think about that perception which is being foisted upon us we would realize how silly that notion really is. Governments and corporations are not people. They do not have a soul. They are huge bureaucratic machines which possess no feelings or compassion. So....one of our basic questions would be......should we put our unwavering trust in this profit/power- driven machine...... when concerning our health and our very lives?

Let's take a closer look at the issue that prompted me to write this post today.I came across webpage that was announcing the need for behavioral vaccines. At first I couldn't believe what I was reading. It was talking about eliminating ADD, criminal behavior...etc...through behavioral vaccines. The Health Ranger even came out with a statement that "behavioral vaccines" were going to be used to chemically lobotomize our brains. http://www.naturalnews.com/034229_science_cyborgs.html  However, I reread the article by Dennis Embry and his concept of behavioral vaccines was this

"A behavioral vaccine is a repeated behavior—scientifically proven—that reduces or prevents morbidity (sickness) or reduces mortality (death). Hand washing is a simple example, which even prevents serious illnesses such as H1N1 Influenza. Infant car-safety seats or bike helmets are more sophisticated examples. Behavioral vaccines can have large public health, public safety and business or productivity effects at a very modest cost."

 So, evidently, the behavioral vaccines that Embry is speaking of ....are psychologically administered and not given through a needle. Despite the seeming misinterpretation of  Embry's behavioral vaccine solution, I still wonder about the true goals of vaccination. There are so many toxic ingredients in vaccines, such as mercury, formaldehyde, aluminum...diseased animal pus...etc...that it's obvious that vaccines do not bolster your immune system in  a healthy and natural manner. In fact, you could say that vaccines over-stress our bodies in an unnatural manner and may be hyperexciting the immune system. Hyperactive immune systems could cause allergies and autoimmune disease. I have been concerned that vaccines ...especially the HPV vaccine...may contain anti-fertility agents for population control. There is also speculation and evidence that childhood vaccinations may be the actual root cause behind the epidemic of ADD and other behavioral and cognitive problems in children.

To get back to the point of this post....which is....are vaccines being promoted to appear as if they are helping us but yet have other motives..... such as birth control, population control at the other end through the stressing of our immune systems and or introducing certain types of bacteria and viruses which may cause autoimmune disease, degenerative disease and death? It seems to me that the extreme push and the scare tactics being used to promote vaccines, for an ever increasing subset of the population....is disproportionate to the marketing of other products. In other words...large amounts of money can be made selling other products so why such a huge emphasis on vaccinating everyone if it was just for profit and for no other reason? If the corporations and government were really concerned about our health, they would have stricter rules concerning food additives and other harmful junk foods. They would strongly discourage the use of sugar which is one of our main causes of infectious disease. Sugar lowers the function of our white blood cells which are the cells that protect us from infection. Have you noticed that  everyone who carries the flu germ, for example, does not necessarily come down with the flu? It's the health or terrain of our body which determines whether or not we will become ill. Vaccines are NOT necessary for flu or illness prevention. In fact, they often cause the very disease they are supposed to prevent. We must take back responsibility for our health by learning about true nutrition. The best advice I have EVER come across and it's advice that makes the most sense to me......was the nutritional wisdom I found through Dr. Weston A Price www.ppnf.org

To try and sum things up.....just be aware that there may be other motives, besides disease prevention, behind our extensive vaccine programs, and that we each need to evaluate what we put in our bodies. How many people who get vaccines, know what they are injecting into themselves? Vaccines used to be forbidden for babies under 6 months because it was thought that their immune systems were not formed enough to handle the inherent insult to the body, now the hepatits vaccine is given immediately after birth! Pregnant mothers were NEVER advised to get vaccines...until very recently that is. Vaccines contain formaldehyde, aluminum, and toxic mercury. It is known that substances such as these can pass directly through the placenta to the fetus, which is why most drugs are discouraged in pregnancy. What has changed? Why are pregnant mothers now being pushed to get the flu vaccine?

People who are noticing the dangerous changes in our government try to warn others. Instead of becoming concerned as normal citizens should, many of those being warned simply change the subject and or act indifferently as if everything is "OK". Many people are either unaware, apathetic, frightened and or feel as if there is nothing they can do. Well...there is something we can do. We can educate ourselves in the tactics of deception and propaganda. These tactics are being used on us for a reason. Deception is necessary in order to control the people. So.....if we learn how to recognize this deception, we will be uncovering it and as a result it loses its power. Vaccines may not quite yet be a vehicle for mind numbing and societal obedience, however, it is one aspect, among the others, that we must consider.If the population is numbed and placated, they just may enjoy their servitude and not rebel.This was the idea of Aldous Huxley. Check out his interview below with Mike Wallace.
We are being told vaccines are for our own good and for the good of the whole....but are they really?

VACCINATION MANIPULATION

The vaccine industry will try anything to frighten people into getting vaccinated. Instead of getting caught up in all of the scare mongering engendered by their marketing schemes, let's take a step back and try to analyze what we have been taught about immunity. Louis Pasteur convinced everyone that the germ itself was the sole culprit in disease causation where Antoine Bechamp hypothesized that it was the terrain of the body which determined whether or not a person would become ill and not merely the presence of a germ. See this link for a detailed discussion of this subject http://www.whale.to/vaccine/shea1.html
For more reading on this subject.....
The Curse of Louis Pasteur

The article below is a prime example of the social engineering aspect of drug marketing. I wonder what "Public Relations" firm was hired to come up with the idea below....not necessarily the article itself but the whole idea behind it? Many times the reporters are given the stories. True immunity comes from a healthy body. Diet, excercise, stress reduction and toxin avoidance and detoxification are the ONLY real ways to prevent disease. Disease prevention through these methods has no side effects where the supposed prevention of disease through vaccination can cause acute reactions in addition to many untold long term side effects which the public is not informed of. Next time you or your child goes to the doctor for a vaccination, ask your doctor to show you the long term studies which prove that a particular vaccine is safe and has no LONG term side effects.When you think about it...that is a very reasonable thing for a responsible citizen or parent to do. This should be done before anyone signs a form of consent which often lists death as a possible side effect.

When vaccine manufacturers advertise their products, no long term side effects are ever listed...only the acute side effects are mentioned. This appears to be a tactic used to subtly condition people to not even consider the possibility of long term side effects....such as autoimmune disease....which often takes years to manifest. The common expectation people have after they receive a vaccine is to wait for an acute reaction to the toxic injection and if they don't get a fever or aches and pains within a day or so, they then feel that this is the end of the possible dangers from vaccines and they think that they are now home free.The incidence of autoimmune disease has increased sharply and seems to coincide with the increase in the number of vaccines people receive. The drug companies are not going to indict themselves so we must begin making our own correlations. Even if the drug companies did conduct long term studies on vaccines...who are they doing these studies on? Are we the long term studies? Is our generation of cancer, autoimmune disease...etc...a direct result of the basically mandatory vaccines we were forced to get?

I very recently heard of a drug company, whom I will not mention at this point, which conducted drug studies on children who were wards of the state and several of them died. Are you going to trust your children's lives to a corporation?

Everyone harbors germs in their bodies. Our immune systems and or vaccines do not totally erradicate these organisms. For example many people test positive for Lyme disease or Epstein Barr virus and even AIDS but not everyone manifests with disease. This was also true way before vaccinations were ever in use. When there is food scarcity or an excess of processed food is eaten, this is when we become susceptible to degenerative and infectious disease. Please see The Price Pottenger Nutrition Foundation for extremely valuable information concerning this subject http://www.ppnf.org/

Let's take a quick look at the tactics used below. First let's just mention that the media...in general... is making it appear that vaccines are the only solution to preventing disease.  At times diet and excercise may be very briefly mentioned but drug/vaccine companies of course never mention that diet is a huge determinant in maintaining health and preventing colds, the flu and other infectious diseases. Sugar, alcohol, white flour products, caffeine...etc...are all stressors on the body and weaken the body's immune defenses. If the government (which is meshed with the vaccine manufacturers) really cared about our health, they would be teaching citizens how to prevent the need for vaccines. There is also a huge debate over whether vaccines even prevent disease. That is another whole area of discussion. One point I would like to make however, is that it is being discovered that the diseases that vaccinations supposedly prevent are possibly morphing or being labeled as other similar conditions as a way of disguising epidemics. We do NOT have less disease because of vaccines. In fact, we are drowning in a sea of degenerative and autoimmune disease. WHY? Where are the longterm studies that can prove to us that vaccines are not the cause of our country's failing health?

The article below uses the threat of inconvenience, embarrassment, surveillance and quarantine to persuade people to get any and every vaccine that is recommended by Corporate America. The following sentence used in the article below seems to be for the purpose of implying that government and health experts must be more accurate or knowledgeable than celebrities. Here is the sentence."Health experts and government studies have found no link between vaccinations and autism, but celebrities have claimed otherwise, fueling an outspoken but small anti-vaccine movement."

Please read the article below with the social engineering aspect in mind. We need to be able to spot this type of conditioning and manipulation. We also need to become very familiar with the tactics used by Public Relations firms.

Recently I have been researching a bit into medicinal mushrooms and how they can be used to support our immune systems naturally http://tinyurl.com/4hmhkkg  and
http://tinyurl.com/5wy6djx  I believe the best results come from using the whole food and teas made from the whole food...rather than using extracts/pills. There are many important foods that can be used to support our immune systems but often it is the foods (processed foods) which we eliminate which can make the biggest difference in our health.

How To Stay Out Of Measles Quarantine: Know Your Shots


by Eliza Barclay

April 18, 2011
http://tinyurl.com/3ot5bdt

Forget snakes. There could be measles on the plane.

Maybe Matt Kohlstedt would have been better off sitting near the chatty guy or the crying baby on his flight back to the U.S. from work trip to Germany in late March.

Kohlstedt got an unusual phone call from a nurse at the local health department after he was home in Madison, Wisconsin. Someone seated a couple rows away on his flight from Frankfurt to Chicago was sick with measles.

"She asked me if I knew if I was vaccinated," Kohlstedt, a 30-year-old grad student, tells Shots. "I said I was 99 percent sure I had been, but that I could check with my mom (how embarrassing!) to confirm."

It was a busy time for Kohlstedt, and he didn't get an answer right away. Two days later, there several were voicemails on his cellphone from the department asking about the vaccinations again. Then the nurse's supervisor called in a panic, saying that if he didn't supply his vaccination history right away the county would quarantine him for three weeks. That did it. "I immediately called my doctor and then called them back with the dates," he said.

It turns out Kohlstedt's story is becoming more common. Measles remains rare in the U.S. When cases crop up, they're often traced to travelers entering the country from overseas. To keep these cases from morphing into outbreaks, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention keeps very close tabs on people like Kohlstedt who might be exposed.

So how did the epidemiologists find Kohlstedt? When a highly infectious disease like measles is confirmed on a flight — usually after the patient seeks medical care and the doctor reports the case to local health authorities or the CDC — the airline releases the passenger information to health authorities.

Measles was declared eliminated in the United States in 2000, and the disease hasn't come back because most kids get their measles-mumps-rubella shots. Health officials recommend the vaccine for all children at age 12 to 15 months, with a booster at age 4 to 6 years.

Coverage rates for the MMR vaccine are still very high, but dropped slightly in 2009 to 90.6 percent from 93.5 percent in 2008. Some say the decline stems from parents' fears that vaccinations could be linked to autism. Health experts and government studies have found no link between vaccinations and autism, but celebrities have claimed otherwise, fueling an outspoken but small anti-vaccine movement.

What concerns health experts about this is that measles cases still pop up, typically after young children or unvaccinated adults pick it up when traveling overseas to countries where it's endemic.

"There are plenty of opportunities to get measles around the world," Dr. Greg Wallace, leader of CDC's MMR and Polio team, told Shots. "So it would be nice if travelers would get vaccinated or make sure they're up to date so that we can prevent outbreaks from happening in this country in susceptible populations." Most susceptible, Wallace says, are babies too young to get the vaccine and older ones who never got it.

Of the 692 measles cases reported between 2001 and 2010 by the CDC, some 87 percent were "import-associated."

This year there's already been a surprisingly high number of imported cases. The average number of cases per year over the last decade has been about 69, yet for reasons the CDC can't explain, the number of cases so far in 2011 has already hit 73. Nearly all of those were import-associated.

As for Kohlstedt, he's feeling fine. But the county health department said it will keep calling him once a week until May just to make sure he doesn't have any signs of the illness.

MAKE AN INFORMED VACCINE DECISION FOR THE HEALTH OF YOUR CHILD

MAKE AN INFORMED VACCINE DECISION

VACCINATED CHILDREN CAN BE DANGEROUS TO OTHERS

One of the tactics being used to get us all vaccinated is to make it socially unacceptable to NOT get vaccinated.The quote below which states that vaccinated people form a ring of protection around those who have not been vaccinated, couldn't be further from the truth. If people have been vaccinated with a live vaccine, they are a danger to those who have NOT been vaccinated.The virus can be shed to others. See the link at the bottom where this issue is discussed. Also...people carry germs around whether they are vaccinated or not.It is the health of their immune systems which determines whether or not they will become sick due to the germs they are carrying.

I don't believe that vaccines totally eliminate viruses from our body but SUPPOSEDLY they just increase our immunity to the germ.In other words the statement below is trying to make us believe that when someone is vaccinated that they have no germs in their body left to pass on to those who are unvaccinated.

However, if a person does not want to be vaccinated....their defense can be keeping their immume systems healthy by cutting down on sugar and other refined foods and supporting their immune systems with lifestyle changes, herbs, cod liver oil...etc. The ingredients(toxins) in vaccines can disturb our immune function in the long run...not build it up naturally the way it should be done.

The excerpts from the article below are what got me going on this subject today.
http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/news/ordered-to-have-vaccine/story-e6freuy9-1225988181709

"Outside the court, National Centre for Immunisation Research & Surveillance research head Professor Robert Booy said immunisations prevented very serious diseases.

He said 97 per cent of parents had their children vaccinated and that immunisations formed a chain of protection around those vulnerable to infection.

"The only way we can protect the vulnerable, and that may be a newborn or someone with an immune deficiency, is to ensure other people are vaccinated," he said."

Here is a link that discusses the question as to which child is more of a danger to others...the vaccinated or the unvaccinated. Then the video below that link is Dr. Tim O'Shea answering questions concerning the dangers of vaccines

http://tinyurl.com/6y7gg7b
  We must be vocal and refute the latest tactics being used to socially manipulate people for the benefit of the drug companies.

FLU SCAM

Not A Good Year to Get The Flu Shot

– Dr Tim O’Shea

author of Vaccination Is Not Immunization

For those of you who followed the swine flu vaccine hoax of 2009 very carefully through to its demise this past year, there were some important lessons.

Inconsistency followed indiscretion in the media steamroller that tried to shove this imaginary threat through the skin of the American people in the past 2 years. And will all that is said about the dumbing down of Americans, etc., we still resist being oversold on anything. We were simply oversold on the threat of swine flu and the necessity for the vaccine. And so Americans rejected the H1N1 vaccine, with the exception of a few thousand ignorants who would probably inject Drano if the CDC told them they needed it.

A few of the things that didn’t add up in the public mind:

- the threat of swine flu was never proven real


- no single causative virus was ever identified


- there was no screening test to identify cases; no lab tests, no culturing


- figures were irresponsibly conjured up


- the spokesmen for FDA, CDC, NIH, and WHO all made hysterical predictions for over a year, none of which ever came true


- clinical trials only lasted 5 weeks before the vaccine was approved and licensed, when testing for any new vaccine takes at least a year


- unlimited amounts of mercury were allowed in the new vaccine


- cases were diagnosed on the telephone


- cases of regular flu were artificially re-categorized for the obvious purpose of marketing an untested vaccine


- the last ditch effort in the summer of 2010 to sell the vaccine out of every drugstore in the US was too shrill to be credible


- the economic entanglements between the regulators and the vaccine companies became public knowledge

All these facts are chronicled and referenced in detail in the 4 chapters on swine flu that appear at www.thedoctorwithin.com And though most people don’t have all these details at their fingertips, still the public got the general impression that the vaccine was at least unnecessary, if not outright dangerous, despite the unrelenting media hysteria that lasted the better part of 2 years. And so they declined.

Then on 2 July 2010 the New York Daily News reported an unprecedented event, on page A8. For the first time in memory, stockpiles of unused H1N1 vaccine were being returned and burned. Why this is notable is that even though batches of vaccine, known as lots, do have expiration dates, in actual practice they are virtually never thrown out, but stored and stockpiled indefinitely. The marketplace claim is that a similar microbial threat may occur in the future, for which the vaccine can be trotted back out, tweaked a little, and then given rubber stamp re-approval for use into the general population, even though it has been sitting on the shelf for decades.

There are many examples of this, the most famous one in recent years certainly being the post 9/11 smallpox vaccine hoax. At that time 3 vaccine manufacturers were given contracts to produce millions of doses of smallpox vaccine, you may remember, to protect the American public from the imaginary bioterrorist threat. They were under the gun, since the threat was ‘imminent.’ Serendipitously, one of the companies – Aventis – suddenly discovered 90 million ‘lost’ doses of smallpox vaccine which had been stockpiled for 30 years, sitting there in their freezers. “Testing” took place and it was soon asserted that the old vaccine was ‘still good’ and the FDA approved the entire lot for use as smallpox vaccine for the American population. This story is told in detail in the chapter “Smallpox: Bringing a Dead Disease Back To Life” .

So back to July 2010 – why was this particular unused H1N1 vaccine being burned instead of stored? Very suspicious.
READ MORE
http://tinyurl.com/28h5kav

NEW STUDY LINKS VACCINES TO AUTISM

http://www.ageofautism.com/2010/07/new-study-shows-vaccines-cause-brain-changes-found-in-autism.html
 New Study Shows Vaccines Cause Brain Changes Found in Autism

By Dan Olmsted and Mark Blaxill

Abnormal brain growth and function are features of autism, an increasingly common developmental disorder that now affects 1 in 60 boys in the US. Now researchers from the University of Pittsburgh and Thoughtful House Center for Children in Austin, Texas, have found remarkably similar brain changes to those seen in autism in infant monkeys receiving the vaccine schedule used in the 1990’s that contained the mercury-based preservative thimerosal.

The group’s findings were published yesterday in the journal Acta Neurobiologiae Experimentalis. They used scanning techniques that assessed both brain growth and brain function in the same animals over time. The research team was able to see differences in the way the brains of vaccinated and unvaccinated animals developed. Scans were performed before and after the administration of primary MMR and DTaP/Hib boosters that were given at the human equivalent of 12 months of age.

Throughout the study period, vaccinated animals showed an increase in total brain volume – a feature of the brain in many young children with autism - when compared with unvaccinated animals. However, a specific part of the brain associated with emotional responses that is thought to be important in autism, the amygdala, did not show abnormalities until after the 12-month vaccines had been given. In addition, after the 12-month vaccines only, the functional brain scans showed significant differences between vaccinated and unvaccinated groups. These functional scans looked at the activity of receptors for morphine-like compounds (opioids) that may play a role in the brain of children affected by autism. Vaccine administration was associated with an increase in opioid binding activity in the amygdala compared with a decrease in the unvaccinated group.

The results indicate that multiple vaccine exposures during the previous 3-4 months may have had a significant impact on brain growth and development in ways that are consistent with the published data on autism. For the amygdala, the novel findings of abnormal growth and function appear to be a function of more recent vaccine exposures - the 12-month primary MMR vaccine and the DTaP and Hib boosters.

In an accompanying editorial Dr. Kris Turlejski, the Editor-in-Chief, described the findings as “alarming”, “support[ing] the possibility that there is a link between early immunization and the etiology of autism.”

In the same primate model, the research team has already identified delayed acquisition of vital brainstem reflexes in infants exposed to the thimerosal-containing hepatitis B vaccine on the first day of life, compared with unvaccinated animals. A larger, second phase study is currently underway to see if these findings can be replicated.

Dr. Andrew Wakefield, who is not a listed author but whose support in the design of the study is acknowledged, said “I hope the model will not only provide important insights into the origins of autism, but also ways of safely testing possible new autism treatments and vaccines.”

References:

Laura Hewitson, Brian J. Lopresti, Carol Stott, N. Scott Mason, and Jaime Tomko. Influence of pediatric vaccines on amygdala growth and opioid ligand binding in rhesus macaque infants: A pilot study. Acta Neurobiol Exp 2010. 70: 147–164

Kris Turlejski. Focus on Autism Editorial Comment Acta Neurobiol Exp2010. 70: 117–118

Dan Olmsted is Editor of Age of Autism. Mark Blaxill is Editor-At-Large. Their book The Age of Autism; Mercury, Medicine and a Manmade Epidemic is available for pre-orderHERE.

VACCINES: WHAT CDC DOCUMENTS and SCIENCE REVEAL....DVD

WHY DO WE TRUST VACCINES?

It appears as though our military men and women , along with the general population, are being experimented on. When vaccine injuries are reported to the government or the vaccine manufacturers, the public is not informed and most often the vaccine injury reports are ignored and or covered up. Injecting foreign DNA, formaldehyde, squalene, mercury and other toxic substances into the human bloodstream....is not natural.

True immunity is gained through proper nutrition, healthy lifestyle habits and previous natural exposure to germs. When bacteria, viruses and toxins enter our bodies through natural routes.....respiration and digestion...there are natural mechanisms in place to deal with infections through these routes. It is highly suspected that while many who have been vaccinated do not have acute immediate reactions to vaccines......a large portion of the vaccinated seem to eventually aquire autoimmune disease. It is thought by some that vaccines dysregulate our immune systems, making them either hyperactive or underactive and very likely could be turning our immune systems against our own bodies.

The vaccine companies think that these conditions can never be traced back to the vaccines most of us have had as children. However, I'm sure there must be a way scientists can link our current pandemic of autoimmune degenerative diseases to vaccines. Is anyone trying to do this?
Please watch the video at the bottom link and see what is happening to our servicemen and women.The incident in the video below was reported on a couple of years ago but it still relevant today. Gorbachev told the Politburo back in the 80s, that their aim was to disarm the Americans and let them fall asleep
http://lymesentinel.blogspot.com/2009/07/keep-eye-on-gorbachev.html Are they disarming us by infiltration and vaccinations? Are they intentionally placing our National Guard troops overseas and making our servicemen sick with vaccines to make our country more vulnerable?

http://vodpod.com/watch/1912041-military-vaccination-injury?pod=ingaorama

SWINE FLU: MASSIVE COVERUP & PR COMPANIES

I would like to know what public relations company or companies were hired to choreograph the Swine flu propaganda scam. The firm of Burson Marsteller is one of the firms who will work with government agencies and corporations concerning the supposed Swine Flu Pandemic. Here is their advertising to draw clients for this purpose.

http://www.burson-marsteller.com/Pages/SwineFlu.aspx

Knowing what we know concerning the Swine Flu propaganda, it's difficult to imagine that these companies which create the propaganda really believe that they are doing something positive. If they create scenerios to sell a product or a war....you would think they would be aware of the actual truth of the situation. If this is true, how can they live with themselves? Most people probably enter this profession thinking that it's all about harmless advertising. Perhaps they are not always aware of what they may be getting into. Of course everything about PR firms is not negative but some of them are involved in mass deception to manipulate the population.

It seems to me that we should focus a bit more on the PR Firms. If the public realized how big of a role these Public Relation Companies played in deceiving them, maybe there would be more outrage. I'm sure PR companies were involved in framing the whole 9-11 War on Terror Scenerio. It's common practice now to utilize these companies to sell fear campaigns and to choreograph whole war scenerios. This needs to be more extensively written about.

LIST OF Healthcare and medical Public Relation Firms http://www.odwyerpr.com/profiles/profiles_october_healthcare.pdf

The following audio is of Dr. Mercola interviewing Dr. Russell Blaylock concerning the TRUTH about the Flu vaccines and vaccines in general. It's something everyone needs to listen to...especially pregnant women.

http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2009/11/03/What-We-Have-Learned-About-the-Great-Swine-Flu-Pandemic.aspx

VACCINE COVERUP....ROBERT KENNEDY JR.

Mercury isn't the only toxic ingredient in vaccines and we must keep this in mind. If and when the mercury is removed from vaccines, the false assumption may be made that the vaccines are now safe. There is a movement to "GREEN OUR VACCINES". The general idea is that if certain ingredients are taken out then vaccines will be safe. The overall purpose of vaccines is to artificially alter the immune system. There is much evidence to conclude that this artificial manipulation of the human body has caused an epidemic of allergies, autoimmune diseases....autism...etc ....and the main culprit may not just be mercury....or even squalene. By injecting foreign DNA into our bodies from animals, microbes...etc, we could be genetically modifying the human race. Another possibility could be that anti-fertility agents could be added to the vaccines. Do we really trust the medical industrial complex enough to have our best interests at heart? For thousands of years humans have used the wisdom of nature to keep themselves healthy. Humans can never imitate the wisdom and balance of nature.

While the video below shows a powerful speech by Robert Kennedy Jr where he addresses vaccines and the mercury issue....please keep in mind that mercury is NOT the only vaccine issue we need to be aware of.

http://www.patriotnewsnetwork.org/2009/11/video-flashback-robert-f-kennedy-jr-on.html

HERBS FOR LYME AND GENERAL HEALTH http://www.1shoppingcart.com/app/?af=1097153

MISCARRIAGE AFTER VACCINATION IS COINCIDENCE

Pregnant women used to be advised against putting anything that was not natural...into their bodies, especially substances which were not tested. The medical system in general, advises against many safe herbs in pregnancy yet it allows and even encourages mercury, squalene, formaldehyde, among many other questionable substances, to be injected into a pregnant woman's body. We need to demand to see the LONG TERM studies which prove that these vaccines have never caused a miscarriage, still birth, infertility or health consequences to the baby and mother.

The following excerpt from the link below states that if pregnant women have miscarriages after vaccination that we must not correlate it with the vaccine and that the miscarriage would only be coincidence. We know that miscarriages occur in nature but to disregard any miscarriage which occurs after vaccination ...as a coincidence.....is utter madness! Is there to be no investigation or study of those who do miscarry after vaccination? Why take this risk in the first place....especially when there isn't any real threat of deadly disease! Where are the short or long term studies which prove that this particular vaccine is safe to give a woman in any trimester of pregnancy? We should also be questioning the age groups being targeted for recent vaccines....and we should be questioning when repeated shots are given in a series as some of the antifertility vaccine literature states that repeated booster shots must be given for the desired goal of infertility to be reached.

"Current Status:Because of the known risks swine flu poses to pregnant women, the CDC advises women to receive flu vaccination during any trimester of pregnancy. The CDC's stance on flu vaccination in pregnancy is that there is no evidence that flu vaccinations cause miscarriages, and that it's important not to assume that miscarriages occurring after H1N1 flu vaccination were directly caused by the vaccine simply because of the correlation in timing. Pregnant women are a high-priority group for vaccination and prenatal care providers are being urged to promote the vaccine." Whole article found at link below
http://miscarriage.about.com/od/miscarriagecauses/i/swine-flu-shots-h1n1-safety-in-pregnancy.htm

See the video below on lack of adverse vaccination reaction reports and followup
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QQZpm4-6YfM&feature=related

The following abstract talks about antifertility vaccines. This was back in 1987. Do you think thay have tried or are trying to implement this yet?

Title: Development of immunological methods of fertility regulation.
POPLINE Document Number: 047581
Author(s):
Spieler J
Source citation:
BULLETIN OF THE WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION, 1987;65(6):779-83.

Abstract:
Birth control vaccines both would increase the choice of methods open to women and men and additionally would offer specific advantages, including the development of vaccines that are unlikely to disrupt the menstrual cycle or cause the side-effects associated with oral contraceptive (OC) use. For a birth control vaccine to be acceptable for use in human beings, it must meet several criteria: the antigen must be unique to the reproductive target; the antigen must have a fertility-related function that can be blocked by antibody or is susceptible to cell-mediated immunity, and alternatively, the function should be located on a cell that can be lysed by complement; an acceptable level of effectiveness should be achieved by no more than 1 or 2 injections for the primary immunization, with booster injections at intervals of no less than 6-12 months; and the vaccine must undergo sufficient testing in animals to ensure its safety for longterm use.

For the vaccine to be widely acceptable, its effects need to be reversible. Before a fertility-regulating vaccine can be envisaged for widespread use in men or women, animal models must be found for thorough testing of toxicity, teratogenicity, effectiveness, duration, and reversibility of immunity and specificity for the target. Theoretically, the mammalian reproductive system is susceptible to immunological intervention at several points. Many reproductive hormones, as well as several antigens could be isolated from the ovum, sperm, embryonic tissue, and fetal tissue, could be candidate targets. Human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) is a major candidate for vaccine development.

The World Health Organization's (WHO) Special Program of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction, through its Task Force on Vaccines for Fertility Regulation, has been supporting research on a synthetic vaccine directed against the last 37 amino acids of the C-terminal end of the beta hCG molecule. A 2nd approach, being followed by the National Institute of Immunology, New Delhi, and the Population Council, New York, involves developing a vaccine against the entire beta chain of the hCG molecule. A prototype vaccine using the beta subunit of ovine luteinizing hormone emulsified with Freund's complete adjuvant has been studied extensively in female primates by the Population Council, but as yet there is no evidence of acute or chronic health hazards in this heterologous immunization model.

The development of a vaccine based on sperm antigens will require considerable basic research. Interference with fertility could occur at several points: during sperm production in the testes, during sperm maturation in the epididymis, or during interaction with the egg in the female reproductive tract. Most research on ovum antigens is directed towards the zona pellucida, the acellular, gelatinous layer surrounding the ovum. It is estimated that vaccines that interfere with sperm function and fertility will be available for human testing by the early 1990s.

http://www.popline.org/docs/0809/047581.html

Please also see this important article. The more we know about this subject AND autoimmune disease, the better off we will be.

The Development of Antifertility Vaccines: Challenging the Immunne System

http://home.snafu.de/usp/antifert.htm

LIVE VIRUS NASAL VACCINE SHEDS AND SPREADS

LIVE VIRUS NASAL VACCINE SHEDS AND SPREADS

When people heard that the virus in the nasal vaccine was a live virus, there was much concern that the vaccine recipient would shed and spread the virus for up to 10 days. The article at the link below speaks of this fear. Logic would continue with the fact that if this vaccine was given before any noticable large outbreak...that it could be the actual catalyst for an outbreak.Recipients were told not to go near those with immune compromised conditions for a period of days.Of course if they go to school, it would spread to others. A couple of weeks ago in Connecticut, the news showed children lining up and recieving doses of the nasal vaccine. Yesterday and today we are hearing blaring news reports that whole school districts are closing down.

Am I missing something or is this an obvious point that the public and medical community should be picking up on? I was in a hospital in New Haven yesterday and spoke to the nurses about this. Many of them were very upset about all the swine flu propaganda and did not want the shots and they were concerned about the nasal vaccines.

http://www.nationalexpositor.com/News/1824.html

HERBS FOR LYME AND GENERAL HEALTH http://www.1shoppingcart.com/app/?af=1097153

THE DEVELOPMENT OF ANTI - FERTILITY VACCINES

The word is being spread through alternative media...and even hinted at in the mainstream media..that the current swine flu vaccine is genetically altered and it's purpose is to reduce the population. My feeling is that this tactic or strategy would be a little too obvious. Vaccines may cause autoimmune disease which can eventually lead to death but this is not what the propaganda is trying to make us fearful of. The insinuation is that the vaccines will cause acute illness and death. My thought is rather that the vaccines may cause fertility problems which would reduce population but yet be hard to link or trace to the vaccines. I feel that this fear mongering concerning acute illness and death may be a distraction. I'm not a scientist but I heard that parts of the hCG hormone can be identified in vaccines...if looked for. If anyone knows the answer to this please leave a comment.

The article at the link below is an excellent summary of antifertility vaccine technology

http://www.biotech-monitor.nl/2502.htm

HERBS FOR LYME AND GENERAL HEALTH http://www.1shoppingcart.com/app/?af=1097153

ARE NEW VACCINES LACED WITH BIRTH-CONTROL DRUGS?

Are New VaccinesLaced with Birth-Control Drugs?
http://www.thinktwice.com/

During the early 1990s, the World Health Organization (WHO) had been overseeing massive vaccination campaigns against tetanus in a number of countries, among them Nicaragua, Mexico, and the Philippines. In October 1994, HLI received a communication from its Mexican affiliate, the Comite' Pro Vida de Mexico, regarding that country's anti-tetanus campaign. Suspicious of the campaign protocols, the Comite' obtained several vials of the vaccine and had them analyzed by chemists. Some of the vials were found to contain human chorionic gonadotrophin (hCG), a naturally occurring hormone essential for maintaining a pregnancy.

hCG and Anti-hCG Antibodies
In nature the hCG hormone alerts the woman's body that she is pregnant and causes the release of other hormones to prepare the uterine lining for the implantation of the fertilized egg. The rapid rise in hCG levels after conception makes it an excellent marker for confirmation of pregnancy: when a woman takes a pregnancy test she is not tested for the pregnancy itself, but for the elevated presence of hCG.

However, when introduced into the body coupled with a tetanus toxoid carrier, antibodies will be formed not only against tetanus but also against hCG. In this case the body fails to recognize hCG as a friend and will produce anti-hCG antibodies. The antibodies will attack subsequent pregnancies by killing the hCG which naturally sustains a pregnancy; when a woman has sufficient anti-hCG antibodies in her system, she is rendered incapable of maintaining a pregnancy.

HLI reported the sketchy facts regarding the Mexican tetanus vaccines to its World Council members and affiliates in more than 60 countries.(1)

Soon additional reports of vaccines laced with hCG hormones began to drift in from the Philippines, where more than 3.4 million women were recently vaccinated. Similar reports came from Nicaragua, which had conducted its own vaccination campaign in 1993. (2)

The Known Facts
Here are the known facts concerning the tetanus vaccination campaigns in Mexico and the Philippines:

* Only women are vaccinated, and only the women between the ages of 15 and 45. (In Nicaragua the age range was 12-49.) But aren't men at least as likely as young women to come into contact with tetanus? And what of the children? Why are they excluded?

* Human chorionic gonadotrophin (hCG) hormone has been found in the vaccines. It does not belong there -- in the parlance of the O.J. Simpson murder trial, the vaccine has been "contaminated."

* The vaccination protocols call for multiple injections -- three within three months and a total of five altogether. But, since tetanus vaccinations provide protection for ten years or more, why are multiple inoculations called for?(3)

* WHO has been actively involved for more than 20 years in the development of an anti-fertility vaccine utilizing hCG tied to tetanus toxoid as a carrier -- the exact same coupling as has been found in the Mexican-Philippine-Nicaragua vaccines.(4)

The Anti-Fertility Gang
Allied with the WHO in the development of an anti-fertility vaccine (AFV) using hCG with tetanus and other carriers have been UNFPA, the UN Development Programme (UNDP), the World Bank, the Population Council, the Rockefeller Foundation, the All India Institute of Medical Sciences, and a number of universities, including Uppsala, Helsinki, and Ohio State.(5) The U.S. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (part of NIH) was the supplier of the hCG hormone in some of the AFV experiments.(6)

The WHO begain its "Special Programme" in human reproduction in 1972, and by 1993 had spent more than $356 million on "reproductive health" research.(7) It is this "Programme" which has pioneered the development of the abortificant vaccine. Over $90 million of this Programme's funds were contributed by Sweden; Great Britain donated more than $52 million, while Norway, Denmark and Germany kicked in for $41 million , $27 million, and $12 million, respectively. The U.S., thanks to the cut-off of such funding during the Reagan-Bush administrations, has contributed "only" $5.7 million, including a new payment in 1993 by the Clinton administration of $2.5 million. Other major contibutors to the WHO Programme include UNFPA, $61 million; the World Bank, $15.5 million; the Rockefeller Foundation, $2.5 million; the Ford Foundation, over $1 million; and the IDRC (International Research and Development Centre of Canada), $716.5 thousand.

WHO and Philippine Health Department Excuses
When the first reports surfaced in the Philippines of tetanus toxoid vaccine being laced with hCG hormones, the WHO and the Philippine Department of Health (DOH) immediately denied that the vaccine contained hCG. Confronted with the results of laboratory tests which detected its presence in three of the four vials of tetanus toxoid examined, the WHO and DOH scoffed at the evidence coming from "right-to-life and Catholic" sources. Four new vials of the tetanus vaccine were submitted by DOH to St. Luke's (Lutheran) Medical Center in Manila -- and all four vials tested positive for hCG!

From outright denial the stories now shifted to the allegedly "insignificant" quantity of the hCG present; the volume of hCG present is insufficient to produce anti-hCG antibodies.
But new tests designed to detect the presence of hCG antibodies in the blood sera of women vaccinated with the tetauns toxoid vaccine were undertaken by Philippine pro-life and Catholic groups. Of thirty women tested subsequent to receiving tetanus toxoid vaccine, twenty-six tested positive for high levels of anti-hCG! If there were no hCG in the vaccine, or if it were present in only "insignificant" quantities, why were the vaccinated women found to be harboring anti-hCG antibodies? The WHO and the DOH had no answers.

New arguments surfaced: hCG's apparent presence in the vaccine was due to "false positives" resulting from the particular substances mixed in the vaccine or in the chemicals testing for hCG. And even if hCG was really there, its presence derived from the manufacturing process.
But the finding of hCG antibodies in the blood sera of vaccinated women obviated the need to get bogged down in such debates. It was no longer necessary to argue about what may or may not have been the cause of the hCG presence, when one now had the effect of the hCG. There is no known way for the vaccinated women to have hCG antibodies in their blood unless hCG had been artificially introduced into their bodies!
Why A Tetanus Toxoid "Carrier"?
Because the human body does not attack its own naturally occurring hormone hCG, the body has to be fooled into treating hCG as an invading enemy in order to develop a successful anti-fertility vaccine utilizing hCG antibodies. A paper delivered at the 4th International Congress of Reproductive Immunology (Kiel, West Germany, 26-29 July 1989) spelled it out: "Linkage to a carrier was done to overcome the immunological tolerance to hCG."(8)

Vaccine Untested by Drug Bureau
After the vaccine controversy had reached a fever pitch, a new bombshell exploded; none of the three different brands of tetanus vaccine being used had ever been licensed for sale and distribution or registered with the Philippine Bureau of Food and Drugs (BFAD), as required by law. The head of the BFAD lamely explained that the companies distributing these brands "did not apply for registration."(9) The companies in question are Connaught Laboratories Ltd. and Intervex, both from Canada, and CSL Laboratories from Australia.

It seemed that the BFAD might belatedly require re-testing, but the idea was quickly rejected when the Secretary of Health declared that, since the vaccines had been certified by the WHO -- there they are again! -- there was assurance enough that the "vaccines come from reputable manufacturers."(10)

Just how "reputable" one of the manufacturers might be is open to some question. In the mid-`80s Connaught Laboratories was found to be knowingly distributing vials of AIDS-contaminated blood products.(11)

Epilogue
At this juncture, evidence is beginning to appear from Africa.(12) HLI has called for a Congressional investigation of the situation, inasmuch as nearly every agency involved in the development of an anti-fertility vaccine is funded, at least in part, with U.S. monies.

For References please visit http://www.thinktwice.com/

HERBS FOR LYME AND GENERAL HEALTH http://www.1shoppingcart.com/app/?af=1097153

ARE VACCINES CHANGING OUR GENETICS?

Vaccines and Production of Negative Genetic Changes in Humans
http://74.6.239.67/search/cache?ei=UTF-8&p=vaccines+alter+DNA&fr=slv8-hptb5&u=vonhapsburg.homestead.com/health.html&w=vaccines+vaccine+alter+altering+dna&d=VA7IDN29Tc4Y&icp=1&.intl=us&sig=cA6x2TBY5327UbBlSgyDMg--
(c) 1996-1998 Leading Edge Research Group

Vaccination and Genetic Change: Mobility of Genetic Material Between Life Forms:

One of the indications that vaccinations may in fact be changing the genetic structure of humans became evident in September of 1971, when scientists at the University of Geneva made the discovery that biological substances entering directly into the bloodstream could become part of human genetic structure. Originally, Japanese bacteriologists discovered that bacteria of one species transferred their own specific antibiotic resistance to bacteria of an entirely different species. Dr. Maurice Stroun and Dr. Philip Anker in the Department of Plant Physiology at the University of Geneva, began to accumulate evidence that the transfer of genetic information is
not confined to bacteria, but can also occur between bacteria and higher plants and animals.
According to an article in World Medicine on September 22, 1971,"Geneva scientists are convinced that normal animal and plant cells shed DNA, and that this DNA is taken up by other cells in the organism."

In one experiment, scientists in Geneva extracted the auricles of frog hearts and dipped them for several hours in a suspension of bacteria.
Afterward, they found a high percentage of RNA-DNA hybridization between bacterial DNA extracted from bacteria of the same species as that used
in the experiment and titrated DNA extracted from the auricles which had
been dipped in the bacterial suspension. Bacterial DNA had been absorbed by the animal cells. This phenomenon has been dubbed transcession.

There is evidence that this kind of phenomenon is happening all the time within the human body. It is conceivable, for example, that heart damage following rheumatic fever could be the result of the immune system reacting to its own cells producing a foreign RNA complex after absorption of foreign DNA.

In Science magazine, November 10, 1972, bacterial RNA was demonstrated
in frog brain cells after a bacterial peritoneal infection. In the April 1973 issue of the Journal of Bacteriology, transcription of spontaneously released bacterial DNA was found to be incorporated into cellular nuclei of frog auricles.

Studies by Phillipe Anker and Maurice Stroun haveindicated spontaneous release of DNA material from mammalian cells, spontaneous transfer of DNA from bacteria to higher organisms, spontaneous transfer of DNA between cells of higher organisms, release of RNA by mammalian cells, and biological activity of released complexes containing RNA.

Malignant Cellular Transformations Caused By Foreign DNA:

There is evidence that freely circulating foreign DNA can cause malignancy.
In a 1977 issue of International Review of Cytology, Volume 51, Anker and Stroun discuss the possible effects of foreign DNA causing malignant cell transformations.
When foreign DNA is transcribed into a cell of a different organism, "this general biological event is related to the uptake by cells of spontaneously released bacterial DNA, thus suggesting the existence of circulating DNA. In view of the malignant transformations obtained with DNA, the oncogenic (cancer-causing) role of circulating DNA is postulated."

The discovery in 1975 that viruses causing cancer in animals had a special enzyme called reverse transcriptase makes the problem even more interesting.
These kind of viruses are called RNA viruses. When an RNA virus has the reverse transcriptase enzyme within its structure, it allows the virus to actually form strands of DNA which easily integrate with the DNA of the host cell which it infects.

Studies by Dr. Robert Simpson of Rutgers University indicate that RNA viruses which do not cause cancer can also form DNA, even without the presence of reverse transcriptase. DNA formed in this way from an RNA virus is called a provirus. It is known that some non-cancerous viruses have a tendency to exist as proviruses for long periods of time in cells without causing any apparent disease. In other words, they remain latent.

Some examples of common RNA viruses that do not cause cancer,per se, but have the capacity to form proviruses are influenza, measles,mumps and polio viruses.
In the October 22, 1967 British Medical Journal, it was brought out by German scientists that multiple sclerosis seemed to be provoked by vaccinations against smallpox, typhoid, tetanus, polio, tuberculosis and diptheria. Even earlier, in 1965, Zintchenko reported12 cases in which MS became evident after a course of anti-rabies vaccinations.

Remember that millions of people between 1950 and 1970 were injected with polio vaccines containing simian virus 40 (SV-40) transferred from contaminated monkey kidney cells used to culture the vaccine. It is impossible to remove animal viruses from vaccine cultures. You are reminded that SV-40, the 40th virus to be discovered in simian tissue, is a cancer-causing virus.
Immunization programs against influenza, measles, mumps and polio are in fact seeding humans with RNA and forming proviruses which become latent for long periods in throughout the body, only to re-awaken later on.

Post-polio syndrome is a good example of this problem. Other examples may include the so-called mesenchymal and collegen diseases, such as rheumatoid arthritis, multiple sclerosis and lupus erythmatosis, where antibodies are formed by the immune system against the person's own tissues - tissues which have been impregnated with foreign genetic material.
According to a special issue of Postgraduate Medicine in May 1962, "although the body generally will not make antibodies against its own tissues, it appears that slight modification of the antigenic character of tissues may cause it to appear foreign to the immune system and thus a fair target for antibody production."

Two yearsl ater in 1964, studies were conducted on the polyoma virus,a tumor-producing DNA virus.
It was discovered that the persistent genetic DNA material in the polyoma virus brought about malignant transformations in hamster embryo cell cultures. This was reported in the November 23, 1964 issue of the Journal of the American Medical Association.
Even common non-tumor viruses, including those in smallpox vaccine and polio virus 2, can act as carcinogens. It was reported in Science on December 15, 1961 that these common viruses acted as catalysts in producing cancer when given to mice in combination with known organic carcinogens in amounts too small to induce tumors themselves. This means that some vaccinations will induce cancer, when combined with the growing problem of environmental pollution from toxic by-products of agriculture (pesticides on and in food) and industry. Of course, this information is hidden from the public,which is why the FDA, EPA and the agricultural industries can get away with "sanctioning" small amounts of pollutants in food, water and air". The
connection has not been made public, much to the joy of the chemical industry, the National Cancer Institute and the growing cancer industry, which continues to fraudulently solicit public donations to justify its own existence.

As an aside, it has already been admitted that polio vaccinations have caused 100% of all polio in the United States since 1980 and the predominant cases of all paralytic polio since 1972 (Science, April 4, 1977). It is suspected that the Salk and Sabin vaccines, made of monkey tissue culture, have also been responsible for the major increase in leukemia in the United States.
The use of viruses, bacteria and animal tissue cultures in mass immunization campaigns, considering that this information has been known for 20
years, constitutes an intentionally created hazard to humans. The global
impact on the wide range of genotypes relative to human beings is difficult to assess, but the outcome is definitely negative, and permitting the
seeding of latent proviruses in humans, knowingly, can have no other rationale other than future medical profiteering, and constitutes a criminal conspiracy of vast proportions which is tantamount to a genocidal policy against the population, further constituting crimes against humanity, which is internationally punishable by death. But, of course, especially in the United States,this fact is ignored and suppressed from public knowledge, despite a 1984 plea by some U.S. physicians to the United Nations in a report.

The fact that this goes on with the full knowledge of the world medical community makes this an international conspiracy where the population has no recourse, given that vaccinations are becoming mandatory and a prerequisite for many social programs.
Persistence of long-term viruses and foreign proteins and their relationship to chronic and degenerative disease was also pointed out by Dr. Robert Simpson of Rutgers University in 1976, when he addressed science writers at an American Cancer Society seminar, saying "these proviruses could be molecules in search of a disease." Dr. Wendell Winters, a virologist at the University of California noted, "immunizations may cause changes in slow viruses and changes in the DNA mechanism." Although host cells containing latent viral particles operate more or less normally, they begin to synthesize viral proteins under the guidance of the viral DNA,eventually creating the circumstances for various autoimmune diseases, including diseases of the central nervous system, which unfortunately add to the growing load of aberrant social behavior patterns.

HERBS FOR LYME AND GENERAL HEALTH http://www.1shoppingcart.com/app/?af=1097153

NATIONAL GUARD: VACCINE DRILLS

Many of you may have heard about the National Guard vaccine drills explained in the article below. The point of these drills is supposedly to control possible riots at schools which have been designated as centers where the public will get their vaccines. The government is claiming that there may be a shortage of vaccines and that people will want these toxic cocktails so badly that they will riot to get them.

Let's try and look at this logically. It's a fact that the media is owned by big corporations. It is also increasingly obvious that our government is meshed with the corporations(one main reason why we don't want government run healthcare). If one isn't getting caught up in the fear inducing media propaganda, one will realize that there is an agenda behind this massive flu campaign.

First of all, it is highly suspected that there is no specific strain of flu that they are testing for. See this article for an explanation http://lymesentinel.blogspot.com/2009/06/likely-truth-about-swine-flu.html

Some people might feel that the flu propaganda is just for the purpose of making money. However, it appears that more may be going on.Because the media is controlled by the corporations/govt, we need to analyze if what they are doing makes any logical sense. To begin with, the media is intentionally using fear psychology to manipulate the people. They are obviously hyping the seriousness of what is going on. They then designated schools to be the place where everyone recieves the vaccines. So...think about this.....first they create the fear, then they designate schools as vaccine centers where children are obviously going to be present......then they have practice drills to take care of riots which may occur. If they really believe this will happen...why then did they pick schools in the first place???

If people are really listening to all the hype and observing how ridiculous the whole thing is they would realize that it would be very risky to take the vaccines which contain many toxic materials. Will there really be riots due to people fighting over who gets the vaccines or will the riots be about not wanting to take the vaccines? They say that in most states the vaccines are not yet mandatory but an orchestrated or hyped up epidemic could be the rationale for declaring martial law. Be very leary of forced evacuations. Don't let the propaganda make you fearful and irrational. Pray, Be STILL and listen for guidance....and remember NOTHING can separate you from the Love of God.

National Guard Takes Over School In Swine Flu “Vaccine Riot” Drill

(Steve Watson)

A High School in Maine is to be taken over by the National Guard today for the purposes of a drill that will see Guardsmen deal with unruly citizens begging for swine flu vaccines.
Oxford Hills Comprehensive High School in Paris, ME, has been chosen as a distribution site for the H1N1 flu vaccine by state officials.

Today’s drill will enact a riot scenario after Gov. John Baldacci and Gen. John Libby, adjutant general of the Maine National Guard, agreed that measures should be in place to deal with a possible public rush for inoculations against swine flu.

“On Thursday morning, four or five National Guard Humvees will travel from Augusta to Paris with vials of fake serum.” reports the Maine Sun Journal.

“The National Guardsmen will take on the roles of panicked citizens and military police and practice what they would do, such as using tear gas, in the case of a riot.” The article continues.
Local police will also liaise with the National Guard on the school grounds. The school itself will remain open, according to the report.

Center for Disease Control figures state that there are 323 confirmed cases of H1N1 in Maine. One man has died from the disease, though he was said to have “underlying health conditions” that were worsened by the flu.
This story dovetails with reports from late July indicating that the U.S. military is gearing up to get involved in the H1N1 swine flu outbreak promised to strike in the Fall.

“The U.S. military wants to establish regional teams of military personnel to assist civilian authorities in the event of a significant outbreak of the H1N1 virus this fall, according to Defense Department officials,” a proposal that is currently on the desk of Defense Secretary Robert Gates, according to a CNN report.
The report indicates that the troops could be drawn from either active duty forces or the National Guard and Reserve forces, or both.

“As a first step, Gates is being asked to sign a so-called ‘execution order’ that would authorize the military to begin to conduct the detailed planning to execute the proposed plan.” the report states.
Gates’ overtures to usurp control of the Guard in a national emergency, and even to eventually merge the Guard and the Army Reserves into the “Total Force” of the U.S. military, under management of the DoD, has riled state authorities.
Last week The National Governors Association wrote to the Pentagon condemning the military’s open plans to effectively seize domestic control of National Guard and federal forces deployed in the event of a disaster or terrorist attack.
The NGA noted that the military’s agenda amounted to a dilution of governors’ constitutional responsibilities.

In addition to these ongoing proposals, the Pentagon has announced that at least 20,000 more active duty soldiers will be placed inside the United States under Northcom to “help state and local officials respond to a nuclear terrorist attack or other domestic catastrophe.”
According to Northcom itself, the move also encompasses “civil unrest and crowd control”.
The ACLU has warned that the deployment represents an expansion in presidential and military authority and a militarization of homeland security.

This trend hasn’t gone unnoticed on Capitol Hill either. Georgia Congressman Paul Broun warned attendees of a town hall event Tuesday that the Obama administration is planning to use a pandemic or a natural disaster to implement martial law in the United States, in the wake of increased political unrest and plunging approval ratings.
The use of the National Guard for law enforcement duties and confrontation of the American people is becoming increasingly commonplace throughout the US.
National Guard troops were used to control the public during the Boston Marathon, the Kentucky Derby, and during New Year celebrations in Times Square last year.
As we reported last week, the sheriff of Alabama’s most populous county has announced he will probably have to bring in National Guard troops to perform law enforcement duties due to budget cuts.

Such a move has been replicated in other parts of the country, including in Schenectady New York, where budgetary constraints were not even cited as a reason for the changeover.
Back in April of this year, The Maryland National Guard was put on alert under an anti-terrorism program in anticipation of nationwide Tea Party protests. A “Force Protection advisory” document stated that Guardsmen and Guard facilities might become “targets of opportunity.”
One month earlier in March, the United States Army Reserve Command published a Force Protection Advisory recommending “situational awareness” and “mitigation measures” in response to End the Fed protests.

Other National Guard outfits have recently undergone training to engage in combat with “militia” groups, and held door to door gun confiscation drills.
Meanwhile, the Army National Guard is advertising for qualified personnel to work as Corrections Officers and Internment/Resettlement Specialists.
The use of military assets in civilian law enforcement is still illegal under Posse Comitatus, unless a clear state of emergency exists.